GAMBLER'$ HANDBOOK

players guide to gambling strategies

 
Home    |     Baccarat    |     Blackjack    |    Craps   |     Roulette    |    Slots    |   Video Poker    |    NLH Poker
Gambling Mathematics    |     Gambling Quotes    |    Poker TV
Best Roulette Rules
Zero Roulette
French Roulette
Progression Betting Systems Majors
Martingale
Labouchere
Misc. PBS
Grand Martingale
Capped Martingale
Dynamic Martingale
D'Alembert System
Avant Dernier
Mechanical Strategies
Biased Wheel Attack
Computer Prediction
Misc. Bets
Red Snake
1st & 3rd Column Strategy
French Bets
General Info
History of Roulette
How to Play Roulette
Roulette House Edge
Famous Roulette Players
Ashley Revell
Joseph Jaggers




powered by FreeFind
Top Online Casinos
888 Casino
Ruby Casino
 

Computer Prediction

There have been a few teams that have attempted to use computers to predict where the roulette ball will fall and hence gain a huge edge on the casino. While
there may be long run statistical observation of randomness, the truth is that each spin is the outcome of the physics of a little ivory ball spinning in one direction and a roulette wheel spinning in the other direction. Subsequently, if you have a little bit of physical information like, the speed of the ball, speed of the wheel, relative position of each then you could use a computer to make a quick calculation on the probable likely positions of landing.

You would not need to have pin - point accuracy, rather you only need to aim to beat the 1 to 35 odds payout. The best way to carry this out is to try to predict the most probable sector the ball will fall in. This is called sector targeting and some people have tried sector targeting with their eyes and instincts alone.  

 
 

Thomas Bass, author of The Newtonian Casino (1991), claimed to be able to predict roulette
outcomes in rapid real time. Also in his book, The Eudaemonic Pie, he chronicles the exploits of a syndicate of computer hackers, called the Eudaemons. Bass claims that in the 1970s the Eudaemons used computers in their shoes to make roulette predictions. The team used a camera and an oscilloscope to track the motion. The computer they used to make the calculation was small enough to fit in a shoe and they used a two team system of an observer and a bettor. The observer input the information by tapping a micro-switch attached to their big toe. Then an electronic signal was relayed to a vibrotactile output system hidden behind the shirt, strapped to the chest, which had three solenoid actuators near the stomach which would indicate by vibrating either which of the eight octants of the roulette to place a bet on, or a ninth possibility: to not place a bet. It is claimed they had a 44% edge on the casino!

In 2004, it was reported that a group in London had used mobile cameraphones to predict the path of the ball.

    "It had transpired that the three gamblers had smuggled into the casino a laser scanner linked to a microcomputer in a mobile phone. As a croupier released the ball onto the roulette wheel, the scanner noted where it had dropped and measured the declining speed of the wheel. All these factors were beamed to the microcomputer, which calculated the section of six numbers upon which the ball would finally settle, and then flashed the information onto the mobile phone before the third spin of the wheel, thus enabling the bets to be placed. The odds of winning were so reduced from 36-1 to 5-1."(^1)

In December 2004 court adjudged that they didn't cheat because their special laser cameraphone and microchip weren't influencing the ball - they kept all of their £1.3m in winnings.(^2)

References
(1) Atherton, Mike (2006), Gambling. London: Hodder & Stoughton
(2)The Guardian: did gang really use a laser, phone and a computer to take the Ritz for £1.3
m?

Home    |    Contact Us